:::Philosophical explorations:::
This post comes with a request for those that read through and wish to respond. It is written like a story or lesson that can unfold if you allow it.
-First: please read this knowing I write this all kindness with Love. I would appreciate that none of my words be interpreted as negative, or that my points and information be disregarded or diminished.
-Second: As to adhere to the alchemical way of 'Ora et Labora - Pray and Work,' I ask and encourage you to step into the 'oratory,' (whatever that may look like for you), and travel through this stream of thought I am about to share. I request this in hopes we can all see for ourselves and embody another alchemical way and axiom you may notice me repeat often -'Nullius in verba.'
-Third: After time & reflection are had in the oratory regarding this content, please read over this comment one more time before proceeding with a response. Everything written here is done so in the light of mutual respect -a matter I was gently reprimanded for recently- and in the hopes that we may all see a continuation of the Alchemical tradition in an honest light.
Please do not continue with this post until you have sat down in your 'oratory' to engage the content in full.
:-:-:-:-:-:-:
Please, consider this:
Let's muse for a moment and say we all admit that we adhere to the Hermetic traditions. A conclusion that could be deemed reasonable for anyone that directs study and practice to Alchemy. If truly, we have made it so far as to engage in explorations regarding the Acetate Path -something only spoken of by those that have at least a general familiarity with Alchemy- if you have made it this far and engage here in this conversation and work, then I would hope that all who are here are familiar in the origins of our Art, the Emerald Tablet, the translatable nature of archetypes such as Thoth, Hermes, and Mercury, and are established in the foundational principles of this Art, Philosophy, Science, and Way - namely the Prima Materia, 3 Principles, 4 Elements, 7 Archetypes, and 12 Processes.
You know, the basics...
If that familiarity is lacking, then the individual might find themselves in a position that far too many forefathers of this Art preface in their texts. A position of being undeserving, ignorant, and assured of failure. I feel confident none of us want that.
But, back to Hermetics...
Hermes, who, in one of his described facets, is the messenger God or entity that moved between the Above and Below, providing connection and communication between these realms. So...
COMMUNICATION:
I brought it up in a previous thread and the comment led to my public warning. But, it's rather important to consider if we desire to fall in line with Hermetics and commune in a community of like-minded thinkers, practitioners, and collaborators. Communication refers to all the means that serve to bind things together. The Latin root Communis means "shared by all." With that in mind, if we are to have a community and thread of communication (even just within this group alone), how do you suppose we can assume that it is found here if our interactions are not exchanged in the shadow of something that is 'shared by all?'
Are we a community here?
If so, what is shared by us all?
Or, further, what is it WE as a collective desire to share together so we can A) all be on the same page and truly co-create a fertile environment for growth and potential, and B) all see for ourselves that community and communication truly are present?
Given my brief look at the root of communication, if we are to accept that the Alchemical "community" seldom agrees upon ideas of the Work as has been suggested in previous comments, why then should we allow ourselves to believe that we share a common interest, understanding, or "community" at all? And, without this communing/communicating factor embodied and 'shared by all,' how can we say we are in line with Hermetic tradition?
^^think on that^^
Hopefully, you have made your way to a comfy, quiet, oratory-type nook for undisturbed reflection already. Now in your comfy nook, please let me provide some contextual information to assist the flow of reason regarding my questions and comments above.
This group (Acetate Path) stands upon a common integer that we might summarize into one word - "Alchemy." Alchemy should be the one thing that is shared by all if we are to truly explore the apparent theme of the group. Obviously, if you don't have alchemical perspective, you would never imagine having a conversation regarding acetates. So, Alchemy seems reasonable as our common ground. I ask you then, should we not at least come to an agreement on what Alchemy is since it's our common ground? For example, consider if one person proclaimed Alchemy to be a spiritual art or metaphor, another replies "nay, tis a process," and the next inline expresses opinion that it's transforming matter, etc. etc... you get the point...If that is at play -these relative responses- we couldn't really say we share the platform of Alchemy because we would hardly be able to even agree to what our base of the community even is.
Do we understand what Alchemy is?
Do you understand?
Is the essential foundation of this conversation shared by all?
Maybe you do understand. Chances are I probably don't know you and we have never met. So, I can't know or say for sure. Regardless of our association, please follow through in reviewing this information so we can be certain we are all speaking to the same thing and hopefully then explore the ideas I am presenting here for establishing actual common ground as opposed to assumed common ground.
Here is a quick video that someone made of me several years ago when they asked if I would sit in front of a camera and answer some of their questions concerning Alchemy. I agreed to the request, and what you find in the link below is the one consistent/uncut response to the question "What is Alchemy?" Please review the video below before proceeding:
This post comes with a request for those that read through and wish to respond. It is written like a story or lesson that can unfold if you allow it.
-First: please read this knowing I write this all kindness with Love. I would appreciate that none of my words be interpreted as negative, or that my points and information be disregarded or diminished.
-Second: As to adhere to the alchemical way of 'Ora et Labora - Pray and Work,' I ask and encourage you to step into the 'oratory,' (whatever that may look like for you), and travel through this stream of thought I am about to share. I request this in hopes we can all see for ourselves and embody another alchemical way and axiom you may notice me repeat often -'Nullius in verba.'
-Third: After time & reflection are had in the oratory regarding this content, please read over this comment one more time before proceeding with a response. Everything written here is done so in the light of mutual respect -a matter I was gently reprimanded for recently- and in the hopes that we may all see a continuation of the Alchemical tradition in an honest light.
Please do not continue with this post until you have sat down in your 'oratory' to engage the content in full.
:-:-:-:-:-:-:
Please, consider this:
Let's muse for a moment and say we all admit that we adhere to the Hermetic traditions. A conclusion that could be deemed reasonable for anyone that directs study and practice to Alchemy. If truly, we have made it so far as to engage in explorations regarding the Acetate Path -something only spoken of by those that have at least a general familiarity with Alchemy- if you have made it this far and engage here in this conversation and work, then I would hope that all who are here are familiar in the origins of our Art, the Emerald Tablet, the translatable nature of archetypes such as Thoth, Hermes, and Mercury, and are established in the foundational principles of this Art, Philosophy, Science, and Way - namely the Prima Materia, 3 Principles, 4 Elements, 7 Archetypes, and 12 Processes.
You know, the basics...
If that familiarity is lacking, then the individual might find themselves in a position that far too many forefathers of this Art preface in their texts. A position of being undeserving, ignorant, and assured of failure. I feel confident none of us want that.
But, back to Hermetics...
Hermes, who, in one of his described facets, is the messenger God or entity that moved between the Above and Below, providing connection and communication between these realms. So...
COMMUNICATION:
I brought it up in a previous thread and the comment led to my public warning. But, it's rather important to consider if we desire to fall in line with Hermetics and commune in a community of like-minded thinkers, practitioners, and collaborators. Communication refers to all the means that serve to bind things together. The Latin root Communis means "shared by all." With that in mind, if we are to have a community and thread of communication (even just within this group alone), how do you suppose we can assume that it is found here if our interactions are not exchanged in the shadow of something that is 'shared by all?'
Are we a community here?
If so, what is shared by us all?
Or, further, what is it WE as a collective desire to share together so we can A) all be on the same page and truly co-create a fertile environment for growth and potential, and B) all see for ourselves that community and communication truly are present?
Given my brief look at the root of communication, if we are to accept that the Alchemical "community" seldom agrees upon ideas of the Work as has been suggested in previous comments, why then should we allow ourselves to believe that we share a common interest, understanding, or "community" at all? And, without this communing/communicating factor embodied and 'shared by all,' how can we say we are in line with Hermetic tradition?
^^think on that^^
Hopefully, you have made your way to a comfy, quiet, oratory-type nook for undisturbed reflection already. Now in your comfy nook, please let me provide some contextual information to assist the flow of reason regarding my questions and comments above.
This group (Acetate Path) stands upon a common integer that we might summarize into one word - "Alchemy." Alchemy should be the one thing that is shared by all if we are to truly explore the apparent theme of the group. Obviously, if you don't have alchemical perspective, you would never imagine having a conversation regarding acetates. So, Alchemy seems reasonable as our common ground. I ask you then, should we not at least come to an agreement on what Alchemy is since it's our common ground? For example, consider if one person proclaimed Alchemy to be a spiritual art or metaphor, another replies "nay, tis a process," and the next inline expresses opinion that it's transforming matter, etc. etc... you get the point...If that is at play -these relative responses- we couldn't really say we share the platform of Alchemy because we would hardly be able to even agree to what our base of the community even is.
Do we understand what Alchemy is?
Do you understand?
Is the essential foundation of this conversation shared by all?
Maybe you do understand. Chances are I probably don't know you and we have never met. So, I can't know or say for sure. Regardless of our association, please follow through in reviewing this information so we can be certain we are all speaking to the same thing and hopefully then explore the ideas I am presenting here for establishing actual common ground as opposed to assumed common ground.
Here is a quick video that someone made of me several years ago when they asked if I would sit in front of a camera and answer some of their questions concerning Alchemy. I agreed to the request, and what you find in the link below is the one consistent/uncut response to the question "What is Alchemy?" Please review the video below before proceeding:
Corny video, I know but...did you gather all that??
Ok, so... What is Alchemy?
It is the UNDERSTANDING of how Consciousness relates to Matter. And, as you saw in the video, I touch again on the topic of Hermes and communication -the connecting factor- As Above, So Below. As Within, So Without.But, why did I just emphasize the word understanding?
In the video, I don't say Alchemy is the KNOWLEDGE of how Consciousness relates to Matter. No, its an Understanding.
Taken from a post I wrote in December:
"Knowledge and Understanding are two very different things. Knowledge is limited to the amount of information the mind contains on a subject. Understanding, however, requires zero information or knowledge. Understanding is purely experiential.
Ex: Imagine you spent countless hours, months, years, studying every possible resource and piece of information you could on the Great Pyramids of Egypt. You went to every conference, watched every film, and maybe even went so far as to write articles, webpages, or books on the subject. Given those circumstances, you could easily say that you know A LOT about this subject. You're so knowledgeable that you could be considered an expert. But still, you don't UNDERSTAND what it's like to stand in the shadow of the Great Pyramid.
Understanding comes through experience. And, experience trumps theory [justified opinion] because it can access Truth. Truth is that which actually exists."
Here is the link to that post if you wish to read the full thought. Which may actually be of great value in this group since the post is about "Following Nature." Seeing that the photo for the group is the image of that exact concept -following nature- taken from Atalanta Fugiens by Michael Maier, it goes to say there may be contextual value. Either way...
https://www.facebook.com/kymiaarts/photos/a.1428831457365508/2534519750130001/?type=3&theater
Truth = Reality:
Truth is singular and unchanging. It has to be to be Truth. Relative truth is not an option in alchemy because we as alchemists should "take no man's word," meaning everything should be personally experienced and verifiable, therefore making it an understanding as opposed to just knowledge. If you take someone's word or opinion then you step into belief. Unfortunately, No belief is true. Belief is opinion and opinions are relative to the preferred belief system of the individual. So, if we entertain opinion, we disregard Truth and ultimately Alchemy, making us out to be rather crumby Alchemists who are supposed to understand how Consciousness relates to Matter. And, once again, if we took the side of opinion, we find that not all are sharing in on the foundation that conversations within this group should technically stand upon. Of course, assuming this group is intended for authentic alchemical work or aspects of it...
Above, in my previous video, I point pretty directly to the actuating cause -Truth- of everything. And, it puts YOU ("I" / consciousness) at the center of the experience. To hold that understanding (experience) right here, right now, -the only "time" you'll ever actually observe anything- would mean you are Truth-Realized. Being Truth-realized means you are engaging in Alchemy and understand because you are experiencing the way in which consciousness relates to matter. In this space of awareness, there is no room for relativity. How could it possibly even exist when we understand and are the Truth - the actuating cause- Sulfur. Which btw, is THE point to everything and where all philosophical, alchemical, or spiritual journeys will take you if you truly do follow nature -your perceived path- all the way and see where she leads.
Truth is singular so there can only be one answer. If you're not currently capable of saying you are having the experience I'm describing, or this doesn't make sense, then we can explore this further intellectually in hopes that more context will provide a path to understanding and realization. Which just happens to be what the proper use of your Mind -the only inherent power you possess- provides when used appropriately and legitimate logic is employed. Now please, sit back for this one, close your eyes, and listen intently to this conversation read aloud from a book titled "Theory of Everything" by Jed Mckenna. This particular text is a conclusive summary to the topic of conversation Jed (a pen name for an anonymous author) explores in a written Trilogy proceeding this particular book:
Ok, so... What is Alchemy?
It is the UNDERSTANDING of how Consciousness relates to Matter. And, as you saw in the video, I touch again on the topic of Hermes and communication -the connecting factor- As Above, So Below. As Within, So Without.But, why did I just emphasize the word understanding?
In the video, I don't say Alchemy is the KNOWLEDGE of how Consciousness relates to Matter. No, its an Understanding.
Taken from a post I wrote in December:
"Knowledge and Understanding are two very different things. Knowledge is limited to the amount of information the mind contains on a subject. Understanding, however, requires zero information or knowledge. Understanding is purely experiential.
Ex: Imagine you spent countless hours, months, years, studying every possible resource and piece of information you could on the Great Pyramids of Egypt. You went to every conference, watched every film, and maybe even went so far as to write articles, webpages, or books on the subject. Given those circumstances, you could easily say that you know A LOT about this subject. You're so knowledgeable that you could be considered an expert. But still, you don't UNDERSTAND what it's like to stand in the shadow of the Great Pyramid.
Understanding comes through experience. And, experience trumps theory [justified opinion] because it can access Truth. Truth is that which actually exists."
Here is the link to that post if you wish to read the full thought. Which may actually be of great value in this group since the post is about "Following Nature." Seeing that the photo for the group is the image of that exact concept -following nature- taken from Atalanta Fugiens by Michael Maier, it goes to say there may be contextual value. Either way...
https://www.facebook.com/kymiaarts/photos/a.1428831457365508/2534519750130001/?type=3&theater
Truth = Reality:
Truth is singular and unchanging. It has to be to be Truth. Relative truth is not an option in alchemy because we as alchemists should "take no man's word," meaning everything should be personally experienced and verifiable, therefore making it an understanding as opposed to just knowledge. If you take someone's word or opinion then you step into belief. Unfortunately, No belief is true. Belief is opinion and opinions are relative to the preferred belief system of the individual. So, if we entertain opinion, we disregard Truth and ultimately Alchemy, making us out to be rather crumby Alchemists who are supposed to understand how Consciousness relates to Matter. And, once again, if we took the side of opinion, we find that not all are sharing in on the foundation that conversations within this group should technically stand upon. Of course, assuming this group is intended for authentic alchemical work or aspects of it...
Above, in my previous video, I point pretty directly to the actuating cause -Truth- of everything. And, it puts YOU ("I" / consciousness) at the center of the experience. To hold that understanding (experience) right here, right now, -the only "time" you'll ever actually observe anything- would mean you are Truth-Realized. Being Truth-realized means you are engaging in Alchemy and understand because you are experiencing the way in which consciousness relates to matter. In this space of awareness, there is no room for relativity. How could it possibly even exist when we understand and are the Truth - the actuating cause- Sulfur. Which btw, is THE point to everything and where all philosophical, alchemical, or spiritual journeys will take you if you truly do follow nature -your perceived path- all the way and see where she leads.
Truth is singular so there can only be one answer. If you're not currently capable of saying you are having the experience I'm describing, or this doesn't make sense, then we can explore this further intellectually in hopes that more context will provide a path to understanding and realization. Which just happens to be what the proper use of your Mind -the only inherent power you possess- provides when used appropriately and legitimate logic is employed. Now please, sit back for this one, close your eyes, and listen intently to this conversation read aloud from a book titled "Theory of Everything" by Jed Mckenna. This particular text is a conclusive summary to the topic of conversation Jed (a pen name for an anonymous author) explores in a written Trilogy proceeding this particular book:
Welcome back...
we should now together be at "Truth is all"
Do you see it logically? Apart from being alchemical in nature, this concept of recognizing Self (Sulfur, Soul, Consciousness, I) as the actuating cause and only verifiable thing in the perceived experience is known in philosophy as Solipsism - a word referenced in the reading. Solipsism contrasts modern scientific thought and puts such a thinker in the realm of Alchemy, a labeled pseudo-science by the majority. It should be understood that Solipsism, when understood correctly, is recognized as "irrefutable" because it is immediately and personally verifiable for anyone that is aware to recognize they are alive. It, therefore, eliminates relative truth, which can only be present regarding things that not everyone can verify or agree to be experiencing. Let's explore that to shine more light and render clarity...
The perceived contrast between science and alchemy -consciousness and matter- exists because of science's preferred law of Falsifiability. A quick google search will pull up Wikipedia and show it to say: "Falsifiability is a key notion in the separation of science from non-science." Or, in our case, Alchemy (pseudo-science) from Science. In science, a theory cannot be established unless potentially falsifiable information can be tested and shown to provide consistent evidence/results that tip the scales in favor of things being the theoretical way science prefers to perceive them at the given moment. Remember though, a theory can never be Truth. There is no such thing as scientific PROOF or TRUTH. It's all relative as long as Falsifiability is an adhered model because the supposed "proof" must forever risk being false. Science can only prove what is False, not what is true. At any given moment a theory/opinion/perspective/belief can become obsolete because new knowledge is supplied or allowed to be observed. This then makes all theories relative and a matter of opinion. Including "alchemical" theories and opinions.
Near the end of the audible text just shared, syllogisms were also explored. Ex: If all men are mortal and Socrates is a man - Socrates is mortal.With all the information just shared, here's another syllogism for consideration:
If falsifiability is a key notion in the separation of science from non-science (alchemy) and science adheres to theory, which must be falsifiable, eventually being proven to be relative due to its falsifiability - to allow for relativity is to adhere to science and disregard/disassociate from Truth/Alchemy.
Chances are, you don't prefer to say or approve of that being you. Which should then mean that there is probably something to seriously consider if you weren't already aware of these lessons or equipped with the same conclusion represented...If that last part about Science and Alchemy didn't sit well, or you want more perspective, here is some extra-credit reading regarding a similar topic of Alchemy vs Chemistry that I shared in the group last week:
https://www.facebook.com/groups/3008737885819019/permalink/3953705307988934/
All things considered:
"In my opinion" statements cannot be found in true alchemical communication. Or, "it's about the journey and process, not the destination" sort of responses. If such communication be the case, then the point (Truth) has been missed. And that is what we call a Sin - a Latin term for "miss the mark." Furthermore, if we are to say that alchemy is to be a spiritual path, it would, of course, have to be in addition to what Alchemy authentically is to be a true statement -the understanding of how consciousness relates to matter- and would have to align with Truth making it eternally true for literally everything. If the statement that alchemy is a spiritual path is true, then this means that the 'spiritual path' would have to reach a point and conclude. The Spiritual 'alchemical' pilgrim would have to realize Truth (the only thing that exists) as the conclusion since Alchemy (the alleged spiritual path) speaks only to that which actually exists (Truth). This would make it out to be not much of a path at all because there is nowhere to go or get to, and instead would be more like a direct way of being and understanding - making it experiential.
I like words, so I will add to that thought that the word Power originally meant "possession of a way." A way to what?? Truth. Or, the actualization of something observed in the moment. Remember back to our video on what is alchemy and the principles of alchemy -Mercury (Hermes - the communicator)/Spirit/Mind is an inherent power of consciousness. It is the power by which Consciousness corresponds to Matter, unifying them and drawing those two perceived things to a singular point, Truth, or conclusion. Some might refer to that as a sort of alchemical wedding...
As Above, So Below.
As Within, So Without.
If we follow this -the most famous and foundational alchemical axiom- then we cannot separate the outside from the inside, the above from the below, "I" from "it."
Going back to logic and our only tool of Mind (Spirit): if this thought be allowed and reach completion then we will find ourselves proceeding to the realization that if something can be found to be True internally/spiritually/philosophically.... then it absolutely has to exist in the perceived 'external' and be true for all things. You can test yourself on just how much of this message you absorbed and understand by reading the article below. As you go through the information, ask yourself if, at this moment, can you personally verify that you are indeed experiencing a perceived external reality of form. There should be a head nod of yes to that perception because you have a body. Salt has been verified. Then ask yourself if you have thoughts and ideas. I would hope to see another head nod of yes. Spirit has just been personally verified. Then ask yourself if you are aware and conscious of both your mind and your body. Once again, I trust that head nod is there. This would prove, right here right now, that you have a soul (Consciousness) and have personally verified the only things you are capable of proving - the Truth- that you (awareness) exist, have the power to think, and seem to be observing something. Check out the article though, try out the exercise, and see for yourself. Don't take my word for it.
https://www.kymiaarts.com/blog/truth-of-the-matter-the-three-basics
But, to conclude all this...
if we are inline with Alchemy, then we must understand and experience that which is - Truth- Consciousness relating to Matter. Anything less is to pin the badge of 'armchair alchemist' or 'puffer' to your dealings. Truth is singular and infinite - this is non-refutable to the wise and aware. Truth is all. We, as alchemists, cannot be named as such if we harbor belief, opinion, and relativity.
So I ask, what do we want?
Do we prefer relative response and interpretation, ensuring fantasy and failure?
Or, do we prefer Life, Truth, and abundant success - things inherent to the authentic alchemist?
we should now together be at "Truth is all"
Do you see it logically? Apart from being alchemical in nature, this concept of recognizing Self (Sulfur, Soul, Consciousness, I) as the actuating cause and only verifiable thing in the perceived experience is known in philosophy as Solipsism - a word referenced in the reading. Solipsism contrasts modern scientific thought and puts such a thinker in the realm of Alchemy, a labeled pseudo-science by the majority. It should be understood that Solipsism, when understood correctly, is recognized as "irrefutable" because it is immediately and personally verifiable for anyone that is aware to recognize they are alive. It, therefore, eliminates relative truth, which can only be present regarding things that not everyone can verify or agree to be experiencing. Let's explore that to shine more light and render clarity...
The perceived contrast between science and alchemy -consciousness and matter- exists because of science's preferred law of Falsifiability. A quick google search will pull up Wikipedia and show it to say: "Falsifiability is a key notion in the separation of science from non-science." Or, in our case, Alchemy (pseudo-science) from Science. In science, a theory cannot be established unless potentially falsifiable information can be tested and shown to provide consistent evidence/results that tip the scales in favor of things being the theoretical way science prefers to perceive them at the given moment. Remember though, a theory can never be Truth. There is no such thing as scientific PROOF or TRUTH. It's all relative as long as Falsifiability is an adhered model because the supposed "proof" must forever risk being false. Science can only prove what is False, not what is true. At any given moment a theory/opinion/perspective/belief can become obsolete because new knowledge is supplied or allowed to be observed. This then makes all theories relative and a matter of opinion. Including "alchemical" theories and opinions.
Near the end of the audible text just shared, syllogisms were also explored. Ex: If all men are mortal and Socrates is a man - Socrates is mortal.With all the information just shared, here's another syllogism for consideration:
If falsifiability is a key notion in the separation of science from non-science (alchemy) and science adheres to theory, which must be falsifiable, eventually being proven to be relative due to its falsifiability - to allow for relativity is to adhere to science and disregard/disassociate from Truth/Alchemy.
Chances are, you don't prefer to say or approve of that being you. Which should then mean that there is probably something to seriously consider if you weren't already aware of these lessons or equipped with the same conclusion represented...If that last part about Science and Alchemy didn't sit well, or you want more perspective, here is some extra-credit reading regarding a similar topic of Alchemy vs Chemistry that I shared in the group last week:
https://www.facebook.com/groups/3008737885819019/permalink/3953705307988934/
All things considered:
"In my opinion" statements cannot be found in true alchemical communication. Or, "it's about the journey and process, not the destination" sort of responses. If such communication be the case, then the point (Truth) has been missed. And that is what we call a Sin - a Latin term for "miss the mark." Furthermore, if we are to say that alchemy is to be a spiritual path, it would, of course, have to be in addition to what Alchemy authentically is to be a true statement -the understanding of how consciousness relates to matter- and would have to align with Truth making it eternally true for literally everything. If the statement that alchemy is a spiritual path is true, then this means that the 'spiritual path' would have to reach a point and conclude. The Spiritual 'alchemical' pilgrim would have to realize Truth (the only thing that exists) as the conclusion since Alchemy (the alleged spiritual path) speaks only to that which actually exists (Truth). This would make it out to be not much of a path at all because there is nowhere to go or get to, and instead would be more like a direct way of being and understanding - making it experiential.
I like words, so I will add to that thought that the word Power originally meant "possession of a way." A way to what?? Truth. Or, the actualization of something observed in the moment. Remember back to our video on what is alchemy and the principles of alchemy -Mercury (Hermes - the communicator)/Spirit/Mind is an inherent power of consciousness. It is the power by which Consciousness corresponds to Matter, unifying them and drawing those two perceived things to a singular point, Truth, or conclusion. Some might refer to that as a sort of alchemical wedding...
As Above, So Below.
As Within, So Without.
If we follow this -the most famous and foundational alchemical axiom- then we cannot separate the outside from the inside, the above from the below, "I" from "it."
Going back to logic and our only tool of Mind (Spirit): if this thought be allowed and reach completion then we will find ourselves proceeding to the realization that if something can be found to be True internally/spiritually/philosophically.... then it absolutely has to exist in the perceived 'external' and be true for all things. You can test yourself on just how much of this message you absorbed and understand by reading the article below. As you go through the information, ask yourself if, at this moment, can you personally verify that you are indeed experiencing a perceived external reality of form. There should be a head nod of yes to that perception because you have a body. Salt has been verified. Then ask yourself if you have thoughts and ideas. I would hope to see another head nod of yes. Spirit has just been personally verified. Then ask yourself if you are aware and conscious of both your mind and your body. Once again, I trust that head nod is there. This would prove, right here right now, that you have a soul (Consciousness) and have personally verified the only things you are capable of proving - the Truth- that you (awareness) exist, have the power to think, and seem to be observing something. Check out the article though, try out the exercise, and see for yourself. Don't take my word for it.
https://www.kymiaarts.com/blog/truth-of-the-matter-the-three-basics
But, to conclude all this...
if we are inline with Alchemy, then we must understand and experience that which is - Truth- Consciousness relating to Matter. Anything less is to pin the badge of 'armchair alchemist' or 'puffer' to your dealings. Truth is singular and infinite - this is non-refutable to the wise and aware. Truth is all. We, as alchemists, cannot be named as such if we harbor belief, opinion, and relativity.
So I ask, what do we want?
Do we prefer relative response and interpretation, ensuring fantasy and failure?
Or, do we prefer Life, Truth, and abundant success - things inherent to the authentic alchemist?
